From technology to politics to video games; these are the random thoughts of a geek with too much time on his hands
It very well might..
Published on August 5, 2006 By Zoomba In Life Journals
A lot of people have been hearing in the news lately about the potential NWA Flight Attendant Union strike. The issue is over a new contract that the airline is putting forward that forces concessions on the workers, again. It's a raw deal for the workers in an industry that has been seeing benefits and pay cut after cut. Airlines have mismanaged themselves into a corner and are now taking it out on their rank and file workers instead of making adequate cuts at the top in line with what they're doing to the folks in the trenches. Right now NWA, like several airlines, is in bankruptcy while they attempt to restructure.

Under bankruptcy and union rules, technically the unions can not hold a legal strike. Many say that any strike at this point could shut the company down permenantly.

And just the other day, the flight attendants voted to overrule their union leadership over the latest revision to their contract and are promising an August 15th strike date. The workers are even tossing their union leaders aside, they're saying that there is in fact no legal reason to stop the strike. They've reached the end of their ropes and are not willing to accept further cuts which they deem highly unreasonable.

So that brings us to today, August 5th, ten days before the strike could begin. I have a flight home on August 17th. I'm going home for the wedding of one of my best friends from High School. So my flight is 2 days after the strike starts, which means that even if the strike is in fact illegal, even if there is a court order to return to work, chances are very slim it would get things operating again in time to get me back to Pennsylvania. What makes things even more dicey is the fact that this strike is supposedly going to be "guerilla warfare" with attendants walking out from select airports instead of all of them. So I may fly out from DTW, make it to State College and not be able to fly back. My flight may be staffed up to a few minutes before flight, there's no consistency to it so there won't be much warning for passengers.

Worst part is, since the airline feels it is in the legal right and that a strike is not legally allowable, they can offer no provisions for the event of a strike. All they were able to tell me is that they're committed to continuing operations and that a strike simply can not take place. And since I bought my ticket through their website as an e-fare, there's no option for a refund. They do say that in the past, they've done their best to arrange alternative flights on other carriers when a stoppage occurs, but whether or not they can pull it off this time, in time for me to get home, remains to be seen.

So no refund, potentially no warning. And I can't afford to buy another ticket on another airline right now without a refund from NWA.

So how can this backfire on the union? Well, if they follow-through the company could collapse and they'd lose their jobs completely instead of just taking a benefits package cut. Then there's the problem of public support. Flight attendants are perhaps the least essential overall of the operation of a flight. They do not load/unload luggage, they do not fly the plane. Their job is to keep the cattle in the back quiet and show them the safety demonstration. I personally find it infuriating that they have the potential to completely disrupt a large chunk of the country's flights. They do serve a purpose in the event of an emergency, I'm sure there are FAA rules about them being there too... but when it comes to the technical operation of a plane, they're not needed.

I know that my sympathy for them and their plight is severely limited when they are being some stubborn and short-sighted about what's going on. There's management too being stubborn, but at some point you have to let the management do it's thing when going through a restructuring. Chances are despite cuts to packages, that most attendants would retain their jobs going forward. A strike could lose them everything completely, and I don't think there'd be much in the way of public support for the union this time around.

It's like sawing off your leg to get at a splinter in your toe.


Comments
on Aug 05, 2006
It is unfortunate, but if you look at the history of Unions, they do have a habit of mass suicide.  Like a parasite on a host, they care nothing for the host other than what they can get out of it.  And then the host dies, they die with it.  Yet parasites have never figured that out.  And from the looks of it, neither have unions.
on Aug 05, 2006
Unions are a wonderful idea based on a need that has gone away, and the assumption that the union members were inherently more virtuous and honorable than the company they were working against. While they often do more harm than good these days, I still wouldn't want to see them removed. They just need to be re-worked with some controls in place. Just like CEOs and corporate boards need some more resonable checks in place.
on Aug 05, 2006

Unions are a wonderful idea based on a need that has gone away, and the assumption that the union members were inherently more virtuous and honorable than the company they were working against. While they often do more harm than good these days, I still wouldn't want to see them removed. They just need to be re-worked with some controls in place. Just like CEOs and corporate boards need some more resonable checks in place.

No.  They are like the Buggy whip.  At one time a necessity.  But today, the only ones that are necessary are the trade unions (and then to enforce standards - which they still abuse).

on Aug 05, 2006
Removing them completely opens the doors for a back-slide. And I don't think for a moment that auto manufacturers, airlines, shipping companies etc are at all more virtuous today than they were a century ago. If they could, they would exploit to the fullest extent possible. Look at Enron, Adelphia, Tyco and so many other floundering companies. They exploit situations whenever they can, and usually only get a slap on the wrist while those exploited get shafted.
on Aug 05, 2006

Removing them completely opens the doors for a back-slide. And I don't think for a moment that auto manufacturers, airlines, shipping companies etc are at all more virtuous today than they were a century ago.

They were necessary when the economy was an American one.  They are just a bad set of inlaws in the global economy.  The old saying "you can never go home again" applies here as well.

on Aug 08, 2006
Whatever the outcome hope you don't get stuck with having to buy a ticket or getting a refund. Some airlines have been known to leave customers stranded even though a few of them make every effort to assist their passengers. I know they're figting for a right and all that and you can't help but sympathise with them.

They just need to be re-worked with some controls in place.


So many of them need re-working! Some of them don't do as good a job anymore. And as you observed, times have change. However as you also observed, they're definately still needed because there are employers out there who would do so much more if they could get away with it!