From technology to politics to video games; these are the random thoughts of a geek with too much time on his hands
Say hello to much smaller, less drastic ones
Published on April 3, 2007 By Zoomba In WinCustomize News

ITNews.com.au is running a story about how the days of "Big Bang" service packs for Windows are a thing of the past, that Vista will instead receive a steady stream of patches and fixes over time.  However, service packs will still exist, they just won't be the massive affairs of Service Pack 1 for XP that came in at 30mb and bundled together a great number of fixes and updates.

The change in approach, according to Michael Sievert, corporate VP for Windows marketing, is due to new development tools and processes that Microsoft used in the creation of Vista lessened the need for the huge service packs of the past.  In essence, Vista was designed to be more easily patched up than previous versions.

This move away from major, often cataclysmic, updates to Windows will likely have the highest impact on enterprise environments, where a service pack can result in multi-month testing and implementations projects that cost millions of dollars.


Comments
on Apr 03, 2007
The only thing that really sucks about this is 2-3 years down the line....when you install a new PC and have to wait 4 hours for all the Windows Update patches to come down.

I actually wish they provided MORE bundles of fixes....like quarterly roll-ups.
on Apr 03, 2007
I prefer large single file updates.. makes managing those updates easier on new installs. I agree with JeremyG, when you install for new systems, it's going to take forever to do the whole Windows Update route. :/ Just give me a massive file and I'll download it.
on Apr 03, 2007
I'm sure there will be rollups, certain checkpoints where they burn new discs for OEMs etc.  But getting away from the one sudden and drastic upgrade is actually a good thing for anyone in a managed environment.
on Apr 03, 2007
Hopefully they will make Update Rollups after a while.
on Apr 04, 2007
Erm - I don't really think 30 mb is that big (okay, so SP2 was much bigger).
And yes, I agree, going through the update routinge with a new install can be quite.. annoying .
(oh, and I guess some people might have a slow connection for huge downloads, as well   )
on Apr 04, 2007
Service Pack 1 for XP that came in at 30mb


I think you misesd a number Zoomba, SP1 came in at nearly, or just over, 130MB.

SP2 is 266MB, and "if" SP3 walks out the door...it should top over 200 as well....seeing as a new install today, requires around 140-180MB of updates.
on Apr 05, 2007
he only thing that really sucks about this is 2-3 years down the line....when you install a new PC and have to wait 4 hours for all the Windows Update patches to come down.


Good point. As it stands right now, we've slipstreamed SP2 into our XP install CD, but even with that, there's a good 50+ updates now to be installed.

Also, what happened to the announcement that they were going to "fast-track" Service Pack 1 for Vista, and have it ready for December? It's supposed to feature WinFS as well as other "features" not ready for the initial release.