From technology to politics to video games; these are the random thoughts of a geek with too much time on his hands
It's so dark... I'm scared.... hold me?
Published on September 13, 2007 By Zoomba In WinCustomize News

If you're running a non-genuine copy of Windows Vista, expect something very unpleasant in the upcoming weeks/months.  Microsoft is activating a function in your PC which, if you're found to be running a non-genuine copy of Vista, the OS will go into "Reduced Functionality Mode", disabling the PC for all intents and purposes.  What will this feature look like in practice?

  • A black screen after 1 hour of use
  • No start menu or task bar
  • No desktop

This is probably the most aggressive stance Microsoft has ever taken on OS piracy, in the past content to letting non-genuine copies run, but to deny them many system patches and improvements.

Will your screen be going dark soon?

Update: According to follow-up stories, the "Reduced Functionality Mode" is not being activated this week.  There is no estimate on when the switch will be flipped.  Many have claimed that the story is an out-right hoax.  Reduced Functionality is something that Microsoft itself has documented.  The inaccuracy in the story was over when it would go into effect.


Comments (Page 1)
4 Pages1 2 3  Last
on Sep 13, 2007
Zubaz waits to see the "Wah!!!  WB made my screen go black" posts
on Sep 13, 2007
I agree. Would start taking bets but it is a real sucker bet.
on Sep 13, 2007
I wonder how this plays into it.

Because of the increase in malware, many companies and government offices forbid the use of software containing Easter eggs for security reasons. With the rise of cybercrime and the prevalence of the Easter egg's "cousin", the logic bomb, there is now concern that if the programmer could slip in undocumented code, then the software cannot be trusted. This is of particular concern in offices where personal or confidential information is stored, making it sensitive to theft and ransom. For this reason, many developers have stopped the practice of adding Easter eggs to their software. Microsoft, who has in the past created some of the largest and most elaborate Easter eggs such as the ones in Microsoft Office, no longer allows Easter eggs in their software as part of their Trustworthy Computing initiative.[5]
on Sep 13, 2007
Sounds like a function Stardock should consider.    I only said consider, but then I have subcriptions to Object Desktop and WC, it wouldn't bother me a bit.       
on Sep 13, 2007
This has already been debunked:

WWW Link

Although it wouldn't surprise me if Microsoft ever did something like this
on Sep 13, 2007
I don't know, I think it's somewhat of an empty threat. Windows XP has been pirated on massive scales globally and Microsoft has never taken this aggressive a stance with that product. Coupled with how unsuccessful Vista has been on the whole I can't imagine they would really put that much effort into something like this. Besides, pirates will just roll back to a pirated copy of XP if this did go into effect. I guess I'll believe it when I see it.
on Sep 13, 2007
Not sure it's all hoax . . . seems like no one at MS is coming out one way or the other.  It's "a spokesman for."

Should be interesting to watch play out.  I'd support the action though.

Another take

And aMS KB article describing "reduced functionality mode"

This article discusses the behavior of reduced functionality mode in Windows Vista. Windows Vista may enter reduced functionality mode if one of the following conditions is true:
You do not activate Windows Vista within the specified activation period.
You modify the computer hardware so that Windows Vista determines that it is running on a different computer. Also, you do not activate Windows Vista within the grace period for reactivation. For retail Windows Vista products or for original equipment manufacturer (OEM) Windows Vista products, this reactivation grace period is three days. For volume licensed Windows Vista products, this reactivation grace period is 30 days.

Note This situation is known as "out of tolerance."
You are running a version of Windows Vista that the Windows Genuine Advantage (WGA) service detects as a "non-genuine" version of Windows Vista.

on Sep 13, 2007
Oh come on....
on Sep 13, 2007
Just spreading the rumor will stop a certain % of people that were going to pirate it.
on Sep 13, 2007
Don't want any type of problem like that?  Simply solution.....don't pirate.

 
on Sep 13, 2007
First --- those studies of the amounts lost are generally paid for by the people claiming to have lost.
Second --- most of them aren't true losses, as the people never would've actually bought the stuff in the first place. So it's not lost revenue, but rather revenue that never existed in the first place.

And my biggest gripe with all these "piracy" arguments is they say "piracy drives up costs", so they put in all this anti-piracy junk, and claim to drastically reduce piracy, but do we ever see the costs come back down accordingly? No... instead they continue to go up, even MORE!

If it weren't for discount programs and free copies from launch events and the like, i wouldn't have gotten most of my software... who can afford 400$ for an OS + 700$ for an office suite? $1100 just for the basic software to run a business pc.

Another prime example is Photoshop. They keep adding more and more layers of anti-piracy to cut down "costs", but they continue to skyrocket the prices. Not to mention the other issue which Adobe brings up of the spyware/malware nature of some of the anti-piracy schemes. For myself, i've dumped Photoshop and gone with Paint.NET because it is rapidly approaching Photoshop's usability (it is quite close already), has no spyware, and doesn't cost the equivalent of three car payments or a months rent!
on Sep 13, 2007
I don't see why anyone cares, everyone who pirates it uses a cracked version that runs fully.

And for all of the people bitching about Vista costing $400, just STOP. A normal version that everyone can use will only cost you $100 - $150.
on Sep 13, 2007
the 150$ version is fine if you dont need any extras, but for a work pc, i need a lot of those, such as full RDC (which for somereason doesnt even come in the business edition), bitlocker (again which should come in the business edition). Even media center (which should come on Home Premium).
If you want (or need) any of these, its ultimate or nothing. Which means you're at the 400$ price point (unless of course you know where to go to buy).
on Sep 13, 2007
do like i did and get the oem build of ultimate for 200 bucks. newegg, tigerdirect, and numerous other online sellers have it at that price.
4 Pages1 2 3  Last