very wonderfull man very perfect

It'll be definitely worth trying. I imagine a lot of people will find it useful, since that's it's aim, but then as is usual, there'll be those resistant to change.

I for one, look forward to trying it out.

It's exciting to see how Cairo is being noticed all over the internet.

One thing about the article to point out, Cairo has no relation with Samurize. It's being developed with C# and WPF.
Also, you are using a very old design, which is not what Cairo is being coded off from currently. The image that should be shown is here:

WWW Link

Our Features page is coming soon.

I actually like the taskbar on the top picture, without the logo. But that's ok, because the rest is so cool!

PurrBall...Where's that link? Something didn't come through.

looks very interesting. will be fun to check out ..

hmmm i don't know why for some reason it reminds me of ubuntu, and that is a good thing!

Link doesn't work........
I would very much like to see the new look........ I'm not fond of the 'iTunes' look.

No idea why the link isn't working, it is for me. If you look in the News section of our site, you should be able to find the latest full-screen one, as well as a peek at our task management.

http://www.cairoshell.com/images/Explorer_Desktop_M1.jpg


www.link in #19 works for me takes me to above page

PurrBall you beat me to it

currently only working with vista... too bad for me i'm using windows xp. (

Oh goodie. Another shell-replacement program. Just out of random curiosity: what's wrong with the current shell-replacement programs?

Ummm, just use OSX?

Is WB/Desktop X a shell replacement program? I would consider those shell enhancement programs, since they run on top of the explorer shell. litestep would be a shell replacement program, only not much big happening there in a while. I personally think it is great to have these guys working on something new. Whether or not it will be super awesome or unusable remains to be seen, but the caliber of the devs is very encouraging. The default visuals are nice and minimalistic but, if it skinnable then it doesn't really matter. If it runs lighter on Vista than the native shell then I am sure it will find a place on many PCs. Vista is begging for some performance enhancements. If it comes with enhanced functionality then that is a bonus, but honestly improved performance and an easy skinning interface would be enough to make it contender. I look forward to seeing the finished product.

So again I ask (after going through this threead) "what makes this better than the Vista Explorer shell?"

I'm not against it . . In fact, I support al;ternative shells.  But it has to do *something* better than what I have.  Can anyone tell me what that is?

Thanks!