From technology to politics to video games; these are the random thoughts of a geek with too much time on his hands
How would YOU change the Democratic Party's approach?
Published on April 28, 2005 By Zoomba In Democrat
In 2000 the Democrats ran a decent campaign and the results were very very close. If you discard the recount debacle, they were actually pretty reasonable throughout.
In 2004 the Democrats ran a dismal campaign. The entire platform was "We hate Bush!" which while an alright sentiment to hold, it was the entirety of their position, they offered nothing new. They brought in people like Moore and shrill Hollywood types to scream, stomp and gnash teeth.

Bush won largely because the Democrats ran one of the worst campaigns ever. A large rock could have beaten Kerry if given the chance. While the win was clear, it was still close when it came to the voter numbers, and there were enough people in the middle that might have swung to the left if Kerry had SAID anything instead of just "I'm not Bush!". A competent campaign on the Dem side probably would have won in the last election.

So things are up in the air for 2008. Bush can't run again so the screamers in the Democratic Party won't have an easy target. It's all up for grabs in 3 years time, and there isn't a clear idea of who from either side might be running. For the sake of comedy and a hell of a furious debate, I'd like to see Rice vs Clinton, that would be fun

If you were given the chance to run the democratic campaign in 2008, what sorts of tactical direction would you take? What mistakes would you avoid? What weaknesses in the Republican Party would you target?

This one is open to people on either side of the political spectrum. I'd like to hear what Democrats think they did wrong and how they could do better next time. I'd also like to hear from the conservatives here on what they percieve some of the weak links in their own armor might be and how they think the Dems could hit them there, play devils advocate to your own beliefs for a bit, it could be interesting.

Rules:
1. No Bush bashing... 2008 has NOTHING to do with Bush... leave it go
2. No Party bashing... Do not insult people who disagree with you or write off entire political parties as "dumb" "greedy" "looney" or whatever.

Comments
on Apr 28, 2005
I have said it all along and continue to say it.  They have to come up with a constructive vision, and run on it.  Dont run on "The sky is falling because Republicans are in  charge" crap.  Run on a vision for the future.  And run someone right of Kerry.  A NE Liberal is not going to be elected again in the near future.
on Apr 28, 2005
It's strange how some people truly believe they have a choice here. Bush and Kerry are cousins in the Skull and Bones secret society. Does no one know what that even means?
on Apr 28, 2005

It's strange how some people truly believe they have a choice here. Bush and Kerry are cousins in the Skull and Bones secret society. Does no one know what that even means?

It means you are clueless.

on Apr 28, 2005
*sigh* Reiki, lets leave the conspiracy theories alone.
on Apr 28, 2005
Hmmmmmmmmmmmm!, Let see now:

1. Dems need to move more to the center, and stop using the Hollywood and music stars to push their ideals.

2. Put out a plan of attack that is outlined so that voters have a better ideal of what the Dems are going for. Don't put out a book like the one Kerry/Edwards put out that did nothing more that indicate what the problems are, but with nothing on how to fix those problems.

3. Get off this kick on we need to tax the upper middle class along with the rich and famous. Stop beating a dead Horse. The problem with this is some of the Dems/liberals who beat on this horse are richer than the average voter (Michael Moore, Alex Baldwin, etc.), thus the voter is some what confused as to why this rich person feels he/she needs to pay more taxes (they really don't - tax loops).

4. Stop saying we need to raise taxes. The people in this country are tried of the same B.S. Instead of saying we are going to raise taxes outline to the voters how we can better streamline the budget to maintain a level of spending that would help pull the nation out of the debt that we are presently in. It isn't paying the taxes so much as it is seeing the taxes go up, and nothing is being seen that is considered beneficial to the average tax payer/voter.

5. Try to come up with a plan of attack that would allow oil drilling to help ease the problems being brought on by the world oil problems (try to remember that there are other nations who use oil on as scale almost that of the U.S.). Be real about helping set up funding for new ideals in the area of energy (re-think the stand on Nuclear power plants).

Hopefully I can think of more as time goes by. Like this idea, and hopefully bloggers will use this forum to bring out some excellent ideals. And, being a woman I think it would be great to see Rice and H. Clinton go at it; it sure would be an interesting compaign.

Pam
on Apr 28, 2005
2 by Reiki-House
Thursday, April 28, 2005


It's strange how some people truly believe they have a choice here. Bush and Kerry are cousins in the Skull and Bones secret society. Does no one know what that even means?


I do and wondered why this was not an issue with many people. they are more than frat brothers, skull and bones weilds a tremendous amount of power in america.. bush and kerry cut from the same peice of very expensive damascus cloth
on Apr 28, 2005
Excellent points Pam!

On the Clinton vs Rice bit... it would be amazing because the Dems couldn't throw the race or gender cards. We'd have a campaign that couldn't devolve into an argument over representation of minorities. With those two fluff issues out of the way (not to say minorities are irrelevant, it's just that it's usually a made up issue used to confuse and anger voters) they would be forced to deal with real issues.
on Apr 28, 2005
On the Clinton vs Rice bit... it would be amazing because the Dems couldn't throw the race or gender cards.


ANd I dont see it happening. WHile Clinton is trying to be a politician, Rice will never be. She is a diplomat and tactician, and finds the subterfuge of politics difficult because of that.

I still think Elizabeth Dole would be the best, but I dont see her running or winning.
on Apr 28, 2005
Zomba; some very good points on the rice and gender card.

The only problem at this point (may not be later) is big bad "John McCain." People tend to see him as a kind of liberal republican that would bring together the two parties (I don't see it myself). Put if Rice could force him to back down and give her his support then you would really see a great race. And, this election could have a significance on how the congress is set. If Clinton gets the nob this may cause a backleace to the present strong hold the republicans have at the time.

With a lame duck in office we should really start seeing the jocking for position by the early players sometime next year. It is going to be fun, and the bloggers are going to be out for a field day no matter who is running.

Pam
on Apr 28, 2005
Dr. Guy

Some good points on Rice. But, you know that the power of the office does fuuny things to the mind. And, oh by the way Dwight D. wasn't a politician, nor was Grant.

Pam
on Apr 28, 2005
And, oh by the way Dwight D. wasn't a politician, nor was Grant.


---I've been reading about grant, and feel he was kinda pushed into the presidency, as he was a supporter of the republican movement back then...kinda strange.....